NEED PRAYERS & POSITIVE ENERGY
Tomorrow, for both of my cases before the Sup Ct of the U.S., determination will be made as to whether or not they will hear my cases and grant certiorari (reveiw). If you pray..., pray they do the right thing, or alternatively spend a few moments in hope, that they will do the right thing. Perhaps the positive energy will sway a majority vote.
Below are the questions I've presented to our highest court. If these cases are heard, the results can be a meaningful step toward reform and re institution of fair due process.
Case against bad actor judge:
1. Whether constitutionally guaranteed rights are usurped when they are not enforceable in either state courts or federal courts, under false cloak of sovereign and judicial immunity even when a plaintiff seeks only equitable relief.
1. Whether constitutionally guaranteed rights are usurped when they are not enforceable in either state courts or federal courts, under false cloak of sovereign and judicial immunity even when a plaintiff seeks only equitable relief.
Case against state & bad actor attorneys:
1. Whether a state’s sovereign immunity is vitiated when the state government is no longer republican in character or form.
2. Whether a citizen of a state has a right to effect reform of the state government through suit in federal court, when a state’s constitution expressly guarantees its citizens an unalienable and indefeasible right to reform the government in such manner as they may think proper and the imperative for reform is undeniable.
3. Whether attorneys are held above the law when state and federal courts wrongfully abrogate jurisdiction, and wrongfully deny fair due process, in cases alleging civil and criminal law and rights violations perpetrated by licensed attorneys.
1. Whether a state’s sovereign immunity is vitiated when the state government is no longer republican in character or form.
2. Whether a citizen of a state has a right to effect reform of the state government through suit in federal court, when a state’s constitution expressly guarantees its citizens an unalienable and indefeasible right to reform the government in such manner as they may think proper and the imperative for reform is undeniable.
3. Whether attorneys are held above the law when state and federal courts wrongfully abrogate jurisdiction, and wrongfully deny fair due process, in cases alleging civil and criminal law and rights violations perpetrated by licensed attorneys.
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Files are out there
