Thursday, December 19, 2019
Sunday, December 15, 2019
JusticeDavidL.lILLEHAUGformerUSATTRYMNformerOutsideCounsel4CitySt.Paul,MN
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT
FILED WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2019
NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.
A18-1171 William DeRosa, Appellant, vs. Craig M. McKenzie, Respondent.
Court of Appeals.
1. A corporate officer who did not author a defamatory statement, but participated in the publication of the statement, may be held personally liable for defamation.
2. The pleadings provided sufficient notice to a corporate officer of the defamation claim against him in his personal capacity for his participation in the commission of a tort to survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Reversed and remanded. Justice Anne K. McKeig.
SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON
DISCLAIMER; USSC10-1032 titled Magner vs. Gallagher
Outside Counsel4CitySt.Paul,MN David Lillehaug DirtyDFL Deals QuoWarranto
given Judgship also City Attorney Sara Grewing.
https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
Executive Summary In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City.
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca8/09-1528/091209p-2011-02-25.html
http://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdf
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/hud-sued-for-records-of-obama-administration-involvement-in-controversial-st-paul-mn-housing-discrimination-case/
ORDERS
A18-0454 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Gretchen Renee Severin, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0240886.
Supreme Court.
Suspended. Justice David L. Lillehaug.
A19-1351 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Christine Michelle Middleton, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 028810X.
Supreme Court.
Suspended. Justice David L. Lillehaug.
Thursday, December 5, 2019
RepMattGaetzVSPamelaKarlanDFLObamaLawPro2019
Thurs.5Dec2019
Fighting Lawyers http://lying-lawyers.blogspot.com
The U.S. Supreme Court signaled it will move quickly to decide whether Donald Trump’s financial records must be turned over to a House committee, telling the president to file an expedited appeal and ordering the files kept private in the meantime.
The justices on Monday set up a briefing schedule that could let them decide by mid-December whether to take Trump’s appeal in the case, which stems from a House subpoena to his accounting firm. If they accept the case, the justices could rule by the end of their term in late June.
In the same order, the court granted Trump’s request to block the subpoena until the justices act, delaying the delivery of the records for at least several more weeks. The court gave Trump until noon on Dec. 5 to file any appeal.
The five-sentence order said nothing about how the nine justices might rule, or even whether they will agree to hear the appeal. None of the justices publicly dissented.
The case is one of two that are testing the court’s willingness to shield the president from investigations into his personal and business affairs. Both subpoenas went to Mazars USA, which isn’t contesting the demands.
The subpoena from the House Oversight and Reform Committee seeks “all statements of financial condition, annual statements, periodic financial reports, and independent auditors’ reports” in the possession of Mazars, as well as supporting documentation and related communications. It covers Trump’s individual finances as well as those of the Trump Organization.
The panel says it wants the documents because it is considering revising the federal ethics-in-government laws. Trump’s lawyers say the primary purpose is law enforcement, something they say is beyond Congress’s legislative powers.
A federal appeals court in Washington backed the committee on a 2-1 vote. Chief Justice John Roberts previously put that ruling on a temporary hold by issuing an administrative stay.
In the New York case, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance is investigating whether Trump’s business falsified records to disguise hush payments to two women who claimed they had sex with him before he took office. In an appeal filed last week, Trump contended that presidents have broad immunity from criminal investigations while in office.
Under an agreement with Vance, Trump asked the court to resolve the case in its current term. Vance’s office said it won’t try to enforce the subpoena until the Supreme Court acts.
The congressional case is Trump v. Mazars, 19A545. The New York case is Trump v. Vance, 19-635.
xx
The justices on Monday set up a briefing schedule that could let them decide by mid-December whether to take Trump’s appeal in the case, which stems from a House subpoena to his accounting firm. If they accept the case, the justices could rule by the end of their term in late June.
In the same order, the court granted Trump’s request to block the subpoena until the justices act, delaying the delivery of the records for at least several more weeks. The court gave Trump until noon on Dec. 5 to file any appeal.
The five-sentence order said nothing about how the nine justices might rule, or even whether they will agree to hear the appeal. None of the justices publicly dissented.
The case is one of two that are testing the court’s willingness to shield the president from investigations into his personal and business affairs. Both subpoenas went to Mazars USA, which isn’t contesting the demands.
The subpoena from the House Oversight and Reform Committee seeks “all statements of financial condition, annual statements, periodic financial reports, and independent auditors’ reports” in the possession of Mazars, as well as supporting documentation and related communications. It covers Trump’s individual finances as well as those of the Trump Organization.
The panel says it wants the documents because it is considering revising the federal ethics-in-government laws. Trump’s lawyers say the primary purpose is law enforcement, something they say is beyond Congress’s legislative powers.
A federal appeals court in Washington backed the committee on a 2-1 vote. Chief Justice John Roberts previously put that ruling on a temporary hold by issuing an administrative stay.
In the New York case, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance is investigating whether Trump’s business falsified records to disguise hush payments to two women who claimed they had sex with him before he took office. In an appeal filed last week, Trump contended that presidents have broad immunity from criminal investigations while in office.
Under an agreement with Vance, Trump asked the court to resolve the case in its current term. Vance’s office said it won’t try to enforce the subpoena until the Supreme Court acts.
The congressional case is Trump v. Mazars, 19A545. The New York case is Trump v. Vance, 19-635.
xx
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Monday, October 28, 2019
HumblePleaEstoppCondemnation603EdmondSt.Paul,MNPettifordsKidneyDialysisMurderbyEvictions
Mon28Oct2019
HUMBLE PLEA TO SHERIFF fLETCHER, POLICE CHIEF AXTELL
In the event of the Forced Eviction today of the Pettiford Family at 603 Edmond St.PAUL,MN
You MUST be aware of the Medical of Wally Pettiford on Daily Kidney Dialysis, IF Pettiford dies, you and your employess must not be held liable. Blindness of the other Brother etc.
THEREFORE;
In your powers of Sheriff and Police Chief, for the Health,Safety of these Afro American Brothers Pettiford must be paramount.
Condemnation of 603 Edmond, may lead to Boarding this Red Brick Building, Stealing all Inside Contents, to further harm,injure, the Pettifords.
Based on the What if the Chimmney Tilts
What if the Shingles on the Roof leak.
Pic;s from 2013 when MELVIN Carter on City Council are fraudulent
used 2019.
 |
| MayorMelvinCarterCouncilPresAmyBredmoen,ChrisTolbert,RebeccaNoecker |
Sent: 10/27/2019 4:52:00 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: Re: Minnesota elections 2019: St. Paul City Council Ward 2 candidates – Twin Cities
John Choi
Charge: Theft by Swindle (over $35,000) Minnesota Statute: 609.52.2(a)(4), with reference to: 609.52.3(1)
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
Charge: Theft by Swindle (over $35,000) Minnesota Statute: 609.52.2(a)(4), with reference to: 609.52.3(1)
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
betty speaker evicted while on dialysis machine - Google Search
(PDF) Sharons Realestate USSC | Sharon Anderson - Academia.edu
![File4[1]Shar Thune 22](https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.slidesharecdn.com%2Ffile41sharthune22-1230856440870053-2%2F95%2Ffile41shar-thune-22-2-728.jpg%3Fcb%3D1230827814&t=1572253796&ymreqid=cf528104-bff9-439d-2c5b-d00151010000&sig=fA9FA1TpB64OnEixAEsuCQ--~C)
WhistleblowerBlog_LawlessAmerica
Subject: Re: Minnesota elections 2019: St. Paul City Council Ward 2 candidates – Twin Cities
Criminal charges vs. Public Employees are not to
be taken lightly. Will update Estopp the Eviction
of Pettiford Family tomorrow
Taxes are still in Pettiford Name, taking of HS Credit?
SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,BLOGS,SOCIAL MEDIA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
OFFICES OF JOHN CHOI,KEITH ELLISON
Affiant re Penalty of Perjury State and Allege Legal Notice to Ramsey ComState, MNAG,CitySt.PAUL
Prelimary Election Contest to be filled at
General to be held NOV5TH 2019
IN THE OFFICE'S 651-266-3222
County Attorney's Office | Ramsey County
County Attorney's Office | Ramsey County
John Choi
MNAG Keith Ellison both D
Home | The Office of Attorney General Keith EllisonFL
Home | The Office of Attorney General Keith EllisonFL
(651) 296-3353 (Twin Cities Calling Area) • (800) 657-3787
by and thro Plaintiff-Complainant
Mrs. Sharon Scarrella Anderson
Candidate QuiTam Relator Complaintant
vs
Amy Bredmoen, Council enbanc, Marcia Mormond,Rachael Tierney,DFL Party, John Doe,Mary Roe etal
COUNT I
Council President Amy Bredmon SponsorOrdinances
Sec. 609.43 MN Statutes
Sec. 609.43 MN Statutes
IN THE MATTER OF PETTIFORD FAMILY 603 EDMUND ST.PAUL,MN JOHN DOE,MARY ROE AS INTERESTS APPEAR
ISSUES
BUILDING DSI Inspectors Joel Essling, 2013 Council Ordinance by then Melvin Carter III, triggering Forensic Files at http://sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com
COUNT II MS involuntary Conversions
CONSPIRACY MURDER BY CONDEMNATION PETTIFORD
EVICTION 28OCT2019
Citys Assault on a Dying Pettiford
daily Kidney Diaylis similar to Betty Speaker.and Roslie Butler et al
Triggers Vacant Building Status,
St.PAUL Council President Amy Bredmoen aka Mrs.Neske,aka Mrs Mike Hahn Director Parks and Rec.
Heinous Abuse of Power in a Patterned Enterprise ie RICO blogged at
COUNT III Consttutional of
City;s Ordinance to Condemn,Evict,Vacant Buildings also
COUNT IV Fair Campaign Practices MS 2II xxx
Denying Pettifords the Right to Vote in the Nov 5.th 2019
via Heinous Stress,Eviction.
COUNT V Theft by Swindle
THEREFORE; THE OUTRAGE OF CITY ST.PAUL,MN
Culpable, Complicit that the alleged $ Five Thousand Tax Forfeiture
with MKT. Value over $100,000.o0o
JUST COMPENSATION MANDATED
City must pay Pettiford Family $95 thousand.
| 609.43 | Misconduct of public officer or employee. |
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE.
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both:
(1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or
(1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or
Mrs.Amy Hahm Council President must seize and desist
any/all resolutions involving Fees,Assessments, Leins against Propertys,
Without Testimony,Probable Cause of DSI INSPECTORS,
owners, including Bank,Insurance before any Ratify/Certifications
can take place. INCLUDING ALL TRASH ISSUES
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
(3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the other's person, property, or rights; or
Manulipating, Ratifying,Certificy on Blind Allegations, of Excessive Inspections.
Techinally Insider Trading on Blind Inspections, to Steal Propertys,Condemn,Disable and 24% increase on Levy on Blind Trash Litigation.
Illegal use of Interest 3.6 now 4.5 to inflate, threaten Citizenery.
(4) in the capacity of such officer
Mrs.Amy Hahm Council President must seize and desist
any/all resolutions involving Fees,Assessments, Leins against Propertys,
Without Testimony,Probable Cause of DSI INSPECTORS,
owners, including Bank,Insurance before any Ratify/Certifications
can take place. INCLUDING ALL TRASH ISSUES
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
(3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the other's person, property, or rights; or
Manulipating, Ratifying,Certificy on Blind Allegations, of Excessive Inspections.
Techinally Insider Trading on Blind Inspections, to Steal Propertys,Condemn,Disable and 24% increase on Levy on Blind Trash Litigation.
Illegal use of Interest 3.6 now 4.5 to inflate, threaten Citizenery.
(4) in the capacity of such officer
FURTHER AFFIANT cannot ty
Bottom Line Inc. | Our experts, your bottom line!
Bottom Line Inc. | Our experts, your bottom line!
pe anymore as Tears in her Blind Eye's
Stress is a
Kidney dialysis: When is it time to stop? - Mayo Clinic Killer, Remember Roslie Butler Kidney Transplant
Kidney dialysis: When is it time to stop? - Mayo Clinic Killer, Remember Roslie Butler Kidney Transplant
CityCouncilAmyBredmoen,MarciaMormondvs603EdmundPettifordFamily2019
 |
| Pettiford603EdmondSt.Paul,MN When Melvin Carter III sponsored Condemnation 603 Edmund 2013 as City Council, now as Mayor Carter HOT SEAT. 2019 |
| RLH OA 19-9 | 2 | 12 | repurchase application, 603 Edmund Avenue | Resolution LH Other Appeal Type | Making recommendation to Ramsey County on the application of Wesley Eugene Pettiford for Repurchase of Tax Forfeited Property at 603 EDMUND AVENUE. |
| Sponsors: | Dai Thao |
| Ward: | Tax Forfeited Property, Ward - 1 |
| Related files: | RLH VO 13-5, RLH VO 12-123, RLH VO 19-43 |
https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
Sharons Cursory Read Pettiford File appears that DSI Inspector Joel Essling started the Condemnation Process,603 Edmond Ave St. Paul MN, CONTRARY TO ADA,HUD as Pettiford on daily Kidney Dyalis, and going Blind then Aug 2019 taken over by the State for FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS.
Today St.Paul City Council has Denied Pay Off to the State by Condemnation without Just Compensation on Senior Disabaled Afro american Brothers ie Pettiford Family.
Must bring Sharon is familar with former Auditor Lou McKenna, indicted for Criminal RICO Activites in the taxing Schemes.
Ch. 609 MN Statutes
Ch. 609 MN Statutes
to the Attention of Ramsey Co. Attorney John.Choi. re Civil/Crimal Code MNAG KEITH Ellison
vs
City Council enbanc,DSI,employees etc.
City St.Paul_Ponzi Principal
City St.Paul_Ponzi Principal
Citys Ponzi Taxing Scheme Condemn to Vacant Buildings Bizzare.
Years ago PETERSON DFL, Daughter Sharon ran against each other for
Ramsey County Board, Madam DeCoursey Won.
Mother Bernice A. Peterson ran for Mayor, Sharon ran4St. Paul City Council. We did not Win, Sharon ended up in Jail, 2nd Husband was Drunk Major PTSD.
We had Fun as a Family, Tenants in Common at 1058 Summit Ave. St. Paul,MN
TO HONOR MY FAMILY, Sharon went to Marshall then Central
Scrool after Pic.
IN THE MATTER OF PETTIFORD FAMILY AT 603 EDMOND
Horrors what City St. Paul is doing to Seniors,Disabled etc.
City Council on 2019-10-23 3:30 PM - There will be no meeting on October 30, the fifth Wednesday of the month. - Oct 23rd, 2019
City Council on 2019-10-23 3:30 PM - There will be no meeting on October 30, the fifth Wednesday of the month. - Oct 23rd, 2019
http://stpaul.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=37&clip_id=3564&meta_id=463619
http://stpaul.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=37&clip_id=3564&meta_id=463619
Please watch video Thurs24Oct.2019 /check out Ramsey Co now has pics of propertys
Citys Condemnation triggers Vacant Building must seize and desist
Evicting Disabled Persons out on the Street, when the WHAT IF Affiant watched Video
Today the Chimmney at 603 Edmund is OK Shingles ruffled in the Wind,
Marcia Mormond is not a Licensed Doctor,Nurse,Building Inspector
her Numerous Condemnations based on WHAT IF must seize and desist.
Affiants OUTRAGE MUST EXP
OSE CITY ST.PAUL VIA BLOGGIN
OSE CITY ST.PAUL VIA BLOGGIN
Pay Property Tax
Summary View
| Parcel ID | 362923230139 |
| Parcel Status | Active |
| Property Address | 603 EDMUND AVE |
Tax Transaction History
| Tax Year | Business Date | Effective Date | Transaction Type | Tax Amount | Special Assessment | Penalty | Interest | Fees | Overpayment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 8/26/2019 | 4/5/2019 | Reallocate | ($7.04) | $7.04 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2019 | 8/26/2019 | Charge Adjustment | ($1,971.40) | ($165.60) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($2,137.00) | |
| 2019 | 7/9/2019 | 7/8/2019 | Payment | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $200.00 | $200.00 |
| 2019 | 7/8/2019 | 7/8/2019 | Payment | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($200.00) | ($200.00) |
| 2019 | 4/5/2019 | 4/5/2019 | Payment | ($87.96) | ($7.04) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($95.00) |
| 2019 | 2/28/2019 | Original Charge | $2,066.40 | $165.60 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $2,232.00 | |
| 2018 | 8/27/2019 | 7/9/2019 | Reallocate | ($26.50) | $26.50 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/27/2019 | 6/5/2019 | Reallocate | ($39.74) | $39.74 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/27/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Reallocate | ($13.24) | $13.24 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/27/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Reallocate | ($26.50) | $26.50 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/27/2019 | 1/4/2019 | Reallocate | ($26.50) | $26.50 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/27/2019 | 7/11/2018 | Reallocate | ($33.12) | $33.12 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/27/2019 | Charge Adjustment | $165.60 | ($165.60) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| 2018 | 8/26/2019 | 7/9/2019 | Reallocate | ($0.46) | ($10.49) | $0.00 | $10.95 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/26/2019 | 6/5/2019 | Reallocate | ($21.70) | ($17.67) | $0.00 | $39.37 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/26/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Reallocate | ($23.35) | ($7.38) | $0.00 | $30.73 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/26/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Reallocate | $9.57 | ($9.57) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/26/2019 | 1/4/2019 | Reallocate | ($145.40) | ($23.90) | $152.41 | $16.89 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/26/2019 | 7/11/2018 | Reallocate | ($142.29) | ($26.22) | $88.02 | $0.00 | $80.49 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 8/26/2019 | Charge Adjustment | ($706.00) | $0.00 | ($240.43) | ($97.94) | ($80.49) | $0.00 | ($1,124.86) | |
| 2018 | 7/9/2019 | 7/9/2019 | Payment | ($173.04) | ($16.01) | $0.00 | ($10.95) | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($200.00) |
| 2018 | 6/5/2019 | 6/5/2019 | Payment | ($238.56) | ($22.07) | $0.00 | ($39.37) | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($300.00) |
| 2018 | 6/4/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Reallocate | $0.10 | $0.01 | $0.00 | ($0.11) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 6/4/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Reallocate | ($0.01) | $0.01 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 6/4/2019 | 1/4/2019 | Reallocate | $0.37 | $0.03 | ($0.34) | ($0.06) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 6/4/2019 | 7/11/2018 | Reallocate | $6.23 | $0.57 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($6.80) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 6/4/2019 | Charge Adjustment | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $6.80 | $0.00 | $6.80 | |
| 2018 | 5/3/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Reallocate | $1.13 | $0.11 | $0.00 | ($1.24) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 5/3/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Reallocate | $0.01 | ($0.01) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 5/3/2019 | 1/4/2019 | Reallocate | $3.76 | $0.35 | ($3.50) | ($0.61) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 5/3/2019 | 7/11/2018 | Reallocate | $64.07 | $5.93 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($70.00) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 5/3/2019 | Charge Adjustment | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $70.00 | $0.00 | $70.00 | |
| 2018 | 5/2/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Reallocate | $0.06 | $0.01 | $0.00 | ($0.07) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 5/2/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Reallocate | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 5/2/2019 | 1/4/2019 | Reallocate | $0.20 | $0.02 | ($0.19) | ($0.03) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 5/2/2019 | 7/11/2018 | Reallocate | $3.38 | $0.31 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($3.69) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2018 | 5/2/2019 | Charge Adjustment | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $3.69 | $0.00 | $3.69 | |
| 2018 | 3/6/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Payment | ($64.70) | ($5.99) | $0.00 | ($29.31) | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($100.00) |
| 2018 | 3/6/2019 | 3/6/2019 | Payment | ($183.07) | ($16.93) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($200.00) |
| 2018 | 1/4/2019 | 1/4/2019 | Payment | ($32.43) | ($3.00) | ($148.38) | ($16.19) | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($200.00) |
| 2018 | 7/11/2018 | 7/11/2018 | Payment | ($148.27) | ($13.71) | ($88.02) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($250.00) |
| 2018 | 2/28/2018 | Original Charge | $1,790.40 | $165.60 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $1,956.00 | |
| 2017 | 8/27/2019 | 12/12/2018 | Reallocate | ($46.12) | $46.12 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/27/2019 | 11/8/2018 | Reallocate | ($23.06) | $23.06 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/27/2019 | 10/5/2018 | Reallocate | ($46.13) | $46.13 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/27/2019 | 9/7/2018 | Reallocate | ($46.13) | $46.13 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/27/2019 | 3/7/2018 | Reallocate | ($102.97) | $102.97 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/27/2019 | 10/6/2017 | Reallocate | ($46.13) | $46.13 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/27/2019 | Charge Adjustment | $310.54 | ($310.54) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| 2017 | 8/26/2019 | 12/12/2018 | Reallocate | $4.75 | ($14.24) | $0.00 | $9.49 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/26/2019 | 11/8/2018 | Reallocate | ($2.22) | ($8.03) | $0.00 | $10.25 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/26/2019 | 10/5/2018 | Reallocate | $2.82 | ($14.64) | $0.00 | $11.82 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/26/2019 | 9/7/2018 | Reallocate | ($51.49) | ($25.57) | $0.00 | $77.06 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/26/2019 | 3/7/2018 | Reallocate | ($155.06) | ($65.12) | $146.71 | $48.47 | $25.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/26/2019 | 10/6/2017 | Reallocate | ($80.06) | ($31.30) | $111.36 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2017 | 8/26/2019 | Charge Adjustment | ($509.50) | $0.00 | ($258.07) | ($157.09) | ($25.00) | $0.00 | ($949.66) | |
| 2017 | 12/12/2018 | 12/12/2018 | Payment | ($158.63) | ($31.88) | $0.00 | ($9.49) | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($200.00) |
| 2017 | 11/8/2018 | 11/8/2018 | Payment | ($74.72) | ($15.03) | $0.00 | ($10.25) | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($100.00) |
| 2017 | 10/5/2018 | 10/5/2018 | Payment | ($156.69) | ($31.49) | $0.00 | ($11.82) | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($200.00) |
| 2017 | 9/7/2018 | 9/7/2018 | Payment | ($102.38) | ($20.56) | $0.00 | ($77.06) | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($200.00) |
| 2017 | 3/7/2018 | 3/7/2018 | Payment | ($188.47) | ($37.85) | ($146.71) | ($48.47) | ($25.00) | $0.00 | ($446.50) |
| 2017 | 1/31/2018 | Charge Adjustment | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $25.00 | $0.00 | $25.00 | |
| 2017 | 10/6/2017 | 10/6/2017 | Payment | ($73.81) | ($14.83) | ($111.36) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($200.00) |
| 2017 | 2/19/2017 | Original Charge | $1,545.46 | $310.54 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $1,856.00 |
, CANDIDATE ETC.
CONSPIRACY TO MURDER BY CONDEMNATION
SICK CITY ST.PAUL WILL MOVE FORWARD.to have Resignations in place
City St.Paul_Ponzi Principal
City St.Paul_Ponzi Principal
HEINOUS VIOLATIONS OF HUD,ADA, RE PETTIFORD BROTHERS ONE ON DYALIS,OTHER GOING BLIND,
WHITE SUPREMIST AMY,BREDMOEN, CHRIS TOLBERT, ASST. CITY ATTORNEY RACHEL TIERNEY, CONSPIRACY TO MURDER VIA CONDEMNATION.
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
| Betty Speaker was a 68-year-old homeowner who lived in the neighborhood behind the state capitol in St. Paul. She had never been late in making a mortgage or property-tax payment. Her troubles with the city of St. Paul began in March 2004 when city workers, excavating to make room for a new high-speed internet cable beneath the pavement, accidentally damaged the city’s sewer line. Because the damaged line was on Speaker’s property, the city decided to hold her responsible for making the repairs. She was given a list of city-approved contractors to do the work. Speaker paid one of them over $3,000 to make the necessary repairs. A city housing inspector named Lisa Martin, who visited the site, claimed that she saw rats near the damaged sewer line. She issued a citation of code violations. Returning to inspect the sewer line, inspector Martin found no rats but she did find many other violations which Speaker would have to address: rubbish, dog feces, improperly parked cars, tall grass and weeds, traces of oil in the back yard. In the winter months of 2004-2005, Martin was back to Speaker’s property eight times, looking for code violations. She even wrote Speaker a ticket for failing to cut the weeds and grass that were then beneath a thick layer of snow. Having spent $3,000 on the sewer repair, Speaker did not have the funds to comply with all these work orders. The city also began issuing fines for “excessive consumption of inspection services.” Speaker was told that she might apply for a grant from the “Neighborhood Development Alliance” to defray part of the cost. As a condition of receiving this money, she had to allow city inspectors to inspect the interior of her house. Into the house went inspector Lisa Martin. She determined that Speaker’s personal belongings constituted a possible fire hazard, that the linoleum floors were not up to city code, and the upstairs units needed a proper fire exit. In short, Speaker’s home was declared unfit for human habitation. On November 9th, inspector Martin accompanied by a St. Paul police office posted a notice of condemnation on Speaker’s front door. Speaker’s son, Joe LeVasseur, tried to argue with the inspector. The police officer told him not to get involved. Even so, LeVasseur’s presence was enough to intimidate these city officials and prevent the condemnation from being carried out. On the following afternoon, Martin returned with six police officers to post the notice on Speaker’s door. Legal-aid attorneys were able to stay the condemnation so that Speaker could make the necessary repairs once she received the grant from the Neighborhood Development Alliance. Joe LeVasseur, a union carpenter, helped with work on the garage. Visiting the site again, inspector Martin told LeVasseur to stop working on this project because he was not licensed with the city of St. Paul. Even so, Speaker and her son made some progress in complying with her work orders. Meanwhile, the stress resulting from the condemnation took a toll on Betty Speaker’s health. She made repeated trips to the hospital. While in the hospital for kidney dialysis, a bench warrant was issued for Speaker’s arrest because she had missed a court appearance related to the condition of her home. The eviction was finally enforced on April 25th. Speaker was forced to live with relatives. Throughout this period, the city of St. Paul continued to issue work orders even as Speaker’s two sons tried their best to bring the property into code compliance. Inspector Martin informed them that her mother’s home was now city property. Joe LeVasseur happened to read an issue of the Watchdog. He contacted its publisher, Jim Swartwood. Swartwood discussed the case with Andy Dawkins, a former state legislator who then headed the St. Paul housing-inspections department. The Watchdog ran a lengthy article on Betty Speaker’s plight. Next, St. Paul housing inspectors condemned a building owned by Swartwood. Swartwood appealed the condemnation. When a housing inspector admitted that he had found no code violations on Swartwood’s property, the hearing officer dismissed the city’s case. It was obviously retaliatory for the bad publicity which the Watchdog had given the city. The pogrom against St. Paul property owners came to the attention of certain Minneapolis landlords who were experienced in fighting city government. Together, Minneapolis and St. Paul landlords carried out two picketing events at St. Paul city hall. Joe LeVasseur attended both. On November 8, 2005, St. Paul residents booted Mayor Randy Kelly out of office. It may not have been full compensation for all the troubles Betty Speaker and others had suffered; but, at least, this was a start. |
betty speaker evicted while on dialysis machine - Google Search
All alleged properties ie: nuisance, contrary to
City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., No. A 06-1188 (Minn. 5/15/2008) (Minn Federal TITLE 31 Money_FinanceCivil,Constitutional
Statutes Banking Laws
WHEN GOVERNMENT BECOMES THE MS 645.08Canons of Construction LAWBREAKER IT BREEDS CONTEMPT
FOR THE LAW Right and Priviledges of living in and remolding your own propertys
Fees of $1,000.00 are arbitrary, caprecious, discriminatory, without Quiet Titles MS555DeclaratoryJudgmentAct
mandating Jurisdictional Statements of Authority.
Vacant buildings as nuisances' ie: Liquor Olmstead v. US 277US438(1928)
(PDF) Sharons Realestate USSC | Sharon Anderson - Academia.edu
To the Above Named,Media,Newspapers,LWV,St.Paul Strong,Trash Issues,
Humble Regard for Truth,Justice,All Candidates,
THINK THEREFORE I AM LIKEND TO REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP. SHARON FREEDOMFIGHTER4YOU. Strict Constitutionalist Save S
ARIZONA v. UNITED STATES | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institutetate and Federal Constitution
Minnesota DHS Continues to Retaliate Against Employee for Speaking Out - Alpha Newss and St. Pa
(8) SharonspdfFilesul,MN Charter/Constitution
ARIZONA v. UNITED STATES | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institutetate and Federal Constitution
Minnesota DHS Continues to Retaliate Against Employee for Speaking Out - Alpha Newss and St. Pa
(8) SharonspdfFilesul,MN Charter/Constitution
Ruling Sharons Cases
Sharon’s discovery of Treason by city officials in all realestate matters: Forcing repeal of State and Federal Laws. Cooking the Fidicuary Books by Mail Fraud , Extortion, Complicity, Theft of Personal Property,defrauding the State of Minnesota and the United States of America, http://sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com
by mail fraud, confusion,stacking,blatant trespass on private property in a “Patterned Enterprise” for Greed, to conspire to commit Murder by WATER SHUTOFF http://sharonanderson.org
Under penalties of perjury, I attest that to the best of my present knowledge, understanding, and belief all matters of fact set out above are accurate and true, so help me God. /s/ Sharon Anderson Disclaimer Word Program by Beale is used for Original and Educational Purposes.
Anthony Gockowski, Author at Alpha News
Anthony Gockowski, Author at Alpha News
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
| Files on E- Democracy, St. Paul - April 06, 2006: Best regards from, Sharon |  | HOME |
| Water Board, 2006 | ||
| Download/Get: File 1 | Constitutionality State Laws | |
| Download/Get: File 2 | Health Issues | |
| Download/Get: File 3 | Eminent Domain Demolition | |
| Download/Get: File 4 | Election Contest | |
| Download/Get: File 5 | POA 4/17/2006 | |
| Download/Get: File 6 | Sharon's Federal Cases 1973 to 2006 | |
| Download/Get: File 7 | USDist.Crt.02-0332 (Rosenbaum) | |
| Download/Get: File 8 | Eminent Domain Homeless Andersons | |
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
In a message dated 10/26/2019 1:49:50 PM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:
xx
WhistleblowerBlog_LawlessAmerica
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)