Friday, July 25, 2014

CommunistParty


1 ShareUnlikeUnlike ·  ·  81st congress report deems bar/lawyers guild
communist 

THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD 5 

The committee does not dispute the right of witnesses appearing before it to have the benefit of counsel. However, the committee believes that the attorneys mentioned above knowingly or unknowingly function under a directive issued by the Central Control Commission of the Communist Party which prohibits its members from cooperating with the committee when subpoenaed before it. Cases are known where persons subpoenaed before the committee indicated a willingness to cooperate with the committee, but when these persons consulted certain of the attorneys listed above they refused to answer questions put to them by the committee.

CONTEMPT FOR AMERICAN COURTS
The real nature of the guThe real nature of the guild's philosophy comes into sharp focus during court procedures. Almost without exception, its leading members, despite their oath as lawyers to uphold the dignity of the court and respect the constitutional mores of jurisprudence, seek to bring the courts and its procedures into disrepute. They substitute insult for argument, resort to intimidation of judges by picket lines, parades,, and personal abuse. In other words, these leaders of the National Lawyers Guild have followed standard Communist practice which provides that — A Communist must utilize a political trial to help on the revolutionary struggle. Our tactics in the public proceedings of the law courts are not tactics of defense but of attack. Without clinging to legal formalities, the Communist must use the trial as a means of bringing his indictments against the dominant capitalist regime and of courageously voicing the views of his party (Johannes Buchner, The Agent Provocateur in the Labour Movement, Workers Library Publishers, New York, pp. 51-52). 

Federal Judge Harold Medina, in citing for contempt the attorneys who defended the 1 1 Communists convicted in New York of advocating the overthrow of the United States Government by force and violence, noted the frequent, and deliberate efforts on the part of the guild attorneys to inject Communist propaganda into the trial. Medina handed down sentences of contempt of court to the following attorneys for the Communists, all of whom are members of the National Lawyers 
Guild: Richard Gladstein, 6 months; George Crockett, 4 months; Maurice Sugar, 30 days; Louis McCabe, 4 months ; Abraham Isserman, 4 months; Harry Sacher, 6 months. 

Abraham L. Pomerantz, a member of the guild, appeared as defense attorney for Valentin Gubitchev, a Russian charged with spying against the United States. Pomerantz based most of his questions on 
notes passed to him by a representative of the Soviet Embassy, seated at his side during the trial. The Russian official, an agent of the NKVD (Soviet secret police) named Novikoff, Hterally stage-managed 
the Gubitchev defense, a procedure without precedent in United States court history. 

Not only has the behavior of guild attorneys been noted officially by several Federal judges, but the American Bar Association in 1949 received from its board of governors a recommendation that the American Bar Association bar from membership any person holding 
membership in the National Lawyers Guild. The action was based on the grounds that guild lawyers held behefs "mcompatible with membership in the American Bar Association." 

6 THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD 

ATTACKS ON THE FBI 

Any action on legislative or executive levels of the Government which tends to interfere with the Communist fifth-column operations in this country is guaranteed to evoke a vicious campaign of opposition 
from the National Lawyers Guild. 

A striking example is the present attack by the guild on the Federal Bureau of Investigation, echoing the current line of the Daily Worker 
and Moscow. The guild today is crying for an investigation of the FBI, the vigilant guardian of our national security, on the ridiculous 
grounds that it is a "Gestapo" or "political police" whose — practices and policies * * * violate our laws, infringe our liberties, and threaten our democracy. 

This attack was timed simultaneously with the tactics employed by the defense in the espionage case involving Judith Coplon. 

This campaign is simply an intensification of a long-standing guild effort to discredit and vitiate the Federal Bureau of Investigation. At its fifth annual convention in 1941, the guild also took action opposing 
"the Gestapo activities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation." At that time, the guild called for removal of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, demanded that Congress reduce the FBI appropriation, and registered opposition to a — pending appropriation bill to allot that Bureau $100,000 for the investigation of so-called subversive activities of Government employees (Lawyers Guild Review, June 1941, p. 66). 

J. Edgar Hoover, testifying on February 7, 1950 before a Senate Subcommittee on Appropriations, noted that the National Lawyers Guild has vociferously denounced the FBI since 1940. Mr. Hoover quoted a guild member as having stated the following at a meeting of 
this front organization in 1940: 

If we keep up the constant criticism of the FBI and of Hoover, and if this criticism is systematically kept up and followed all the time, particularly by organizations, it can and it will weaken the power of the FBI and hamper them very effectively. 

There is no doubt in the opinion of the committee that the National Lawyers Guild attacks on the Federal Bureau of Investigation are part of an over-all Communist strategy aimed at weakening our 
Nation's defenses against the international Communist conspiracy. 

The propaganda disseminated by the guild regarding the FBI is a duplicate of the line put out by Moscow, as demonstrated by the following broadcast by the Soviet Home Service short-wave network, dated February 7, 1950: 

FBI Center of Activities 

The center of the police terror organization of the United States is the notorious FBI. This institution was founded in 1908. From the day of its foundation 
the FBI became the jailer of the population. The head of this organization is responsible to the United States President and keeps him informed of future plans 
and results of past activity. The true bosses of the FBI, however, are the 60 families of American millionaires. All of the activities of the FBI as well as the rest of the United States Government are directed toward the defense of the interests of these actual rulers of modern America. 

The FBI has been turned into an organization for intimidating the United States man in the street by means of all forms of violence, blackmail, terror, and 
other police measures. The monopoly press knows no limit to its praise of the FBI, which was some time ago pronounced by the UP to be "the greatest national 

THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GTHLD 7 

Institution of the United States." The FBI budget grows yearly. In 1949 it was almost * * * dollars. To this must be added the so-called special funds allocated by the President and the Government and the generous and certainly not insignificant presents from the monopolies who wish to develop still further the regime of police terror with a view to the final subjugation of the American people. 

SUPPRESSION OF PROGRESSIVES 

At a time when the United States is the mainstay of the greatest imperialist offensive, the FBI has openly become the tool of hysterical, imperialist reaction 
determined to suppress all progressive thought in the country. The kings of Wall Street, the FBI, and the United States Department of Justice act in close 
contact with the ultra reactionary Committee for the Investigation of Un-American Activities. 

The attitude of the National Lawyers Guild and the Moscow- broadcasts bears a striking resemblance to the following editorial of the Daily Worker of June 13, 1950, page 7: Alibi for Stool Pigeons 

America's No. 1 lawbreaker, J. Edgar Hoover, wants more stool pigeons. His private police machine gets bigger and bigger every year. This govern- ment within the government taps phones illegally, opens private mail illegally, and infests American life with criminal perjurers. As it grows, it devours what is left of the United States Constitution. No secret political police can ever be justified on the basis of the American Constitution. This police makes its own laws and its own rules and operates with its own definitions of "disloyalty" and "subversion." ****** 4> 

The boss of this imitation-Gestapo now wants more money from Congress for more secret stoolies. Naturally, he can only get his dough if he drums up a 
picture of the terrible menace we face from the "Communists." The FBI's "thought control" boss hints that there are 540,000 Americans he would like to 
put in jail. He says they are "operatives" who are just crawling all over J. Edgar Hoover looking for our "secrets." * * * 

AGAINST LOYALTY PROGRAM 

The National Lawyers Guild has also conducted a malicious campaign against the loyalty program, which was inaugurated under Executive Order 9835, on March 21, 1947, in the executive branch of the Government, to rid the Government of subversive and disloyal 
employees. Resolutions attacking the loyalty program as illegal and demanding that the courts declare it unconstitutional were adopted at the national convention of the guild held in New York City in May 1950. At a public forum held under guild auspices on February 11, 1948, the loyalty program was attacked as a thought-control measure. The guild's opposition to the loyalty program was compiled into a 
23-page report entitled "The Constitutional Right to Advocate Political, Social, and Economic Changes — An Essential of Democracy," which was sent to Government officials. Members of Congress, the judiciary, the bar, labor and civic organizations. The conclusion of this report charged that "our citizens are denied the right to advocate fundamental social, economic, and political change." The guild has denounced the Attorney Generals listing of subversive organizations to be used in the Federal loyalty program as a menace to the liberty of the American people. The Guild's committee on constitutional rights and liberties has issued a report on the legality of the action of the Attorney General of the United States in issuing 
H. Kept. 3123, 81-2 2 

8 THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD 

a listing of organizations as subversive pursuant to the President's loyalty order, in which it urged revocation and cancellation of the list. 
OPPOSES LEGISLATIVE ACTION ON COMMUNISM 

Any legislation which would curb the activities of Communists, regardless of the importance of such legislation to our national security, 
is faced with bitter opposition from the National Lawyers Guild. At its first convention, the guild opposed statutes providing that teachers take a loyalty oath or those "making criminal advocacy of or 
membership in any political party" (Daily Worker, February 23, 1937, p. 5). The latter was directed against pending legislation against criminal syndicalism, affecting the legal status of the Communist Party in various States. 

It has opposed legislation directed against the Communist Party, Voorhis registration bill, H. R. 1054; the Tenney law in California barring the Communist Party from the ballot (Lawyers Guild Review, 
June 1941, p. 66; Daily Worker, May 18, 1942, p. 5). 

The National Lawyers Guild denounced the anti-Communist pro- visions of the Taft-Hartley law on the ground that it was unconstitutional. Leonard B. Boudin, chairman of the labor law committee of the National Lawyers Guild, testified before a labor subcommittee of 
the House of Representatives concerning the non-Communist affidavit of the Taft-Hartley bill. At that time, Mr. Boudin stated that the non-Communist affidavit was an insult to the American worker 
because Congress thereby told the workers they were not wise enough to manage their own affairs. 

On May 7, 1948, the National Lawyers Guild denounced the Mundt- Nixon bill to control subversive activities. In commenting on the Mundt-Nixon bill, the Lawyers Guild Review, bimonthly publication of the National Lawyers Guild, made the following statement: 

It would be a costly error to treat this measure as merely another unwise legislative proposal to be analyzed and then routinely disapproved. We believe it is far more than that. Its concepts are so hostile to our democratic way of life that its enactment into law would amount to nothing less than a coup d'etat in constitutional guise. 

The parallel between the above opinion and that of Simon W. Ger- son, who represented the Communist Party, U. S. A., before the Committee on Un-American Activities on May 2, 1950, is striking. We 
quote his comment in part: 

Any bill which seeks such objectives will necessarily do force and violence to the American Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Let us therefore understand the 
issue clearly: The United States can have the Constitution or it can have the Mundt-Nixon bill. It can't have both. On May 2, 1950, Harry C. Lamberton, representing the National Lawyers Guild, testified before the Committee on Un-American Activities against the Nixon bill (H. R. 7595). 

In the July 14, 1949, .issue>f j the Daily Worker, the National Lawyers Guild was reported as urging the defeat of the Government's bill to fix heavier penalties for unlawful possession of secret 
documents, as referred to in the Foreign Agents Registration Act, and to lengthen the statute of limitations’ on prosecution of peacetime 
spies. 

THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD 9 

The autumn 1949 issue of The Guild Lawyer listed the following-^ as highlights of the guild's activities: 

(a) Opposition to S. 595 and H. R 4703 finternal security bill) as written, and urging drastic revisions to conform to constitutional guaranties; 

(b) Opposition to S. 1694 and S 1832 giving Attorney General authority to deport aliens associated with or aiding groups which he finds (without standards or 
hearings) are "subversive of 'Communist' controlled"; 
 
Posted by at 2 comments:

Sunday, April 28, 2013

RICO_RemoveJudgeGreggJohnson re 62-F9-96-001366TriggeredMurder CplJimAndersonSept2000

Affiant is seeking Murder Indictments vs. Judge Gregg Johnson Husband of Susan Haigh
SCAP Panel to Issue Divorce Proceedings based on Jimj Anderson's
Health Court Ordered to Brainard for 1 year, Case Removed to Federal Court
Judge Ann Montgomery  Judicial Orders Triggering DEATH,DISABILITY,DISPARAGMENT OF TITLES MANDATES GRAND JURY HEARINGS FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND SAFETY.http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file8.pdf
BE IN THE MOVIE  http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/videos?query=Minnesota+Sharon+Anderson  www.lawlessamerica.com  Bill Windsor nobodies@att.net     Search results for "Minnesota Sharon Anderson":

SharonsForensicFiles_ - YouTube  http://www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com/

Memorial: Cpl.James R. Anderson

â–º 3:07â–º 3:07
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DczX3W6Ehc4



Dec 10, 2012 - Uploaded by Sharon Anderson... Corrupt Judges Kathleen Gearin,Gregg Johnson,John Vandenorth,Retired or Deceased Judges Larry ...
More videos for Sharon Anderson vs. Judge Gregg Johnson
Register of Actions

62-F9-96-001366 JAMES RICHARD ANDERSON VS. SHARON LEE ANDERSON [J&D 042197 JOHNSON J(GEJ) 1017 199-208]
05/29/1996
Ramsey Family Main
Johnson, Gregg E.
Dissolution without Child
Converted Closed
Case No. 62-F9-96-001366

JAMES RICHARD ANDERSON VS. SHARON LEE ANDERSON [J&D 042197 JOHNSON J(GEJ) 1017 199-208] §
§
§
§
§
§
Case Type: Dissolution without Child
Date Filed: 05/29/1996
Location: Ramsey Family Main
Judicial Officer: Johnson, Gregg E.

Party Information
Lead Attorneys
Petitioner ANDERSON, JAMES RICHARD
DOB: 01/11/1931		 DONNA R JOHNSON
Retained
651-297-6400(W)
Respondent ANDERSON, SHARON LEE
DOB: 01/28/1939		 Pro Se
ST. PAUL, MN 55106

Events & Orders of the Court
DISPOSITIONS
04/21/1997 Default (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding)



Converted Disposition:


Related Participants: ANDERSON, JAMES RICHARD

OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
05/29/1996 Converted Filing Fee
05/29/1996 FLD-Case Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/29/1996 ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
06/17/1996 DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
08/13/1996 JAS-Judge Assignment (Judicial Officer: Williams, Charles H., Jr. )
11/05/1996 SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
11/20/1996 FSF-Family Scheduling Form (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
11/25/1996 SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/06/1996 CANCELED Scheduling Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Williams, Charles H., Jr.)
Other
12/10/1996 DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/17/1996 DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
12/17/1996 RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: Johnson, Gregg E. )
12/17/1996 RCU-Judge Recused (Judicial Officer: Williams, Charles H., Jr. )
12/17/1996 CANCELED Default Hearing (3:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Williams, Charles H., Jr.)
Other
02/04/1997 ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/04/1997 AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/07/1997 DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/14/1997 Pre-trial (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Johnson, Gregg E.)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
04/21/1997 AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/21/1997 CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/21/1997 DCR-Decree (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/15/1997 DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
05/15/1997 DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
07/21/1997 ARC-Archive (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
09/12/1997 ARC-Archive (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
11/08/2003 ARC-Archive (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
04/06/2007 Converted Pending AAbout 621,000 results (0.36 seconds)


Search Results

  1. Sharon4Council: Sharon Ward(2)

    2. sharon4council.blogspot.com/2007/03/sharon-ward2.html
    Mar 5, 2007 – AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON ANDERSON UNDER PENALITY PERJURY. Chief Judge Gregg Johnson his lawyer wife Susan Haigh complicity with ...
    You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 10/1/12

  2. Sharons_CRA

    3. sharonscra.blogspot.com/
    Feb 13, 2009 – Posted by Sharon Anderson at 10:36 AM No comments: ... Copy and paste the following Web address into the "location" or "address" bar of the .... My Documents Scribd acting in concort with SCAP Judge Gregg Johnson ...
    You visited this page.

  3. anderson,sharon-initialsubmission - Scribd

    4. www.scribd.com/doc/71341907/anderson-sharon-initialsubmission
    Jan 11, 2010 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHDA7twqjW4 re : Sharon Anderson's Claim of Cop ..... Judge Gregg Johnson re: Murder of Cpl Anderson.
    You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 9/7/12

  4. TaxTheMax_AbolishPropertyTaxes: Sharons4LawlessAmerica vs ...

    5. taxthemax.blogspot.com/.../sharons4lawlessamerica-vs-citystpaul-et.html
    Dec 12, 2012 – ... for" Corrupt Judges Kathleen Gearin,Gregg Johnson,John Vandenorth ... Posted by Sharon Anderson at Wednesday, December 12, 2012 ...

  5. Sharon4PrivateAG: Sharon Anderson Answer/Cross MN 62cv09-1163

    6. sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com/.../sharon-anderson-answer...
    Apr 2, 2009 – Sharon Anderson Answer/Cross MN 62cv09-1163. Ramsey Dist.Court File no: ... Subj: RE: ReadyTalk Webinar Oswald v.Anderson et al ... AFFIDAVITS OF PREJUDICE AGAINST VARIOUS JUDGES, Specifically Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg Johnson entire SCAP Panel Impeachments are found at ...

  6. SharonsForensicFiles_ - YouTube

    7. â–º 3:07â–º 3:07
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=DczX3W6Ehc4
    Dec 10, 2012 - Uploaded by Sharon Anderson... Corrupt Judges Kathleen Gearin,Gregg Johnson,John Vandenorth,Retired or Deceased Judges Larry ...
  7. More videos for Sharon Anderson vs. Judge Gregg Johnson »

  8. Crimes Against Humanity: November 2010

    9. crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com/2010_11_01_archive.html
    Nov 26, 2010 – Sharon Anderson v. Kathleen Gearin – Google Search ... SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry ...

  9. Crimes Against Humanity: US vs Buchanan_Murder4Hire_Sharon ...

    10. crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com/.../us-vs-buchananmurder4hiresh...
    Nov 26, 2010 – Sharon Anderson v. Kathleen Gearin – Google Search ... SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry ...

  10. Results for similar searches

ctivity (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )
Posted by at 5 comments:

Saturday, March 16, 2013

Right to a Lawyer Can Be an Empty Promise for the Poor Sharon4Anderson AttorneyProSe_QuiTam

Right to a Lawyer Can Be an Empty Promise for the Poor

Right to a Lawyer Can Be an Empty Promise for the Poor Saturday, 16 March 2013 09:15 By Ethan Bronner, The New York Times News Service | Report
Scales of justice(Image: Scales of Justice via Shutterstock)Adel, Georgia - Billy Jerome Presley spent 17 months in a Georgia jail because he did not have $2,700 for a child support payment. He had no prior jail record but also no lawyer. In Baltimore last fall, Carl Hymes, 21, was arrested on charges of shining a laser into the eyes of a police officer. Bail was set at $75,000. He had no arrest record but also no lawyer. In West Orange, N.J., last summer, Walter Bloss, 89, was served with an eviction notice from the rent-controlled apartment he had lived in for 43 years after a dispute with his landlord. He had gone to court without a lawyer.
Fifty years ago, on March 18, 1963, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Gideon v. Wainwright that those accused of a crime have a constitutional right to a lawyer whether or not they can afford one. But as legal officials observe the anniversary of what is widely considered one of the most significant judicial declarations of equality under law, many say that the promise inherent in the Gideon ruling remains unfulfilled because so many legal needs still go unmet.
Civil matters — including legal issues like home foreclosure, job loss, spousal abuse and parental custody — were not covered by the decision. Today, many states and counties do not offer lawyers to the poor in major civil disputes, and in some criminal ones as well. Those states that do are finding that more people than ever are qualifying for such help, making it impossible to keep up with the need. The result is that even at a time when many law school graduates are without work, many Americans are without lawyers.
The Legal Services Corporation, the Congressionally financed organization that provides lawyers to the poor in civil matters, says there are more than 60 million Americans — 35 percent more than in 2005 — who qualify for its services. But it calculates that 80 percent of the legal needs of the poor go unmet. In state after state, according to a survey of trial judges, more people are now representing themselves in court and they are failing to present necessary evidence, committing procedural errors and poorly examining witnesses, all while new lawyers remain unemployed.
“Some of our most essential rights — those involving our families, our homes, our livelihoods — are the least protected,” Chief Justice Wallace B. Jefferson of the Texas Supreme Court, said in a recent speech at New York University. He noted that a family of four earning $30,000 annually does not qualify for legal aid in many states.
James J. Sandman, president of the Legal Services Corporation, said, “Most Americans don’t realize that you can have your home taken away, your children taken away and you can be a victim of domestic violence but you have no constitutional right to a lawyer to protect you.”
According to the World Justice Project, a nonprofit group promoting the rule of law that got its start through the American Bar Association, the United States ranks 66th out of 98 countries in access to and affordability of civil legal services.
“In most countries, equality before the law means equality between those of high and low income,” remarked Earl Johnson Jr., a retired justice of the California Court of Appeal. “In this country for some reason we are concerned more with individuals versus government.”
With law school graduates hurting for work, it may appear that there is a glut of lawyers. But many experts say that is a misunderstanding.
“We don’t have an excess of lawyers,” said Martin Guggenheim, a law professor at New York University. “What we have is a miserable fit. In many areas like family and housing law, there is simply no private bar to go to. You couldn’t find a lawyer to help you even if you had the money because there isn’t a dime to be made in those cases.”
Even in situations where an individual is up against a state prosecutor and jail may result, not every jurisdiction provides lawyers to the defendants. In Georgia, those charged with failing to pay child support face a prosecutor and jail but are not supplied with a lawyer.
Mr. Presley lost his job in the recession and fell way behind on support payments for his four children. In 2011, he was jailed after a court proceeding without a lawyer in which he said he could not pay what he owed. He was brought back to court, shackled, every month or two. Each time, he said he still could not pay. Each time, he was sent back.
A year later, he contacted a public defender who handles only criminal cases but who sent his case to the Southern Center for Human Rights. Atteeyah Hollie, a lawyer there, got him released that same day, helped him find work and set up a payment plan.
An important service lawyers can provide defendants like Mr. Presley is knowledge of what courts want — receipts of medical treatment, evidence of a job search, bank account statements. On their own, many people misstep when facing a judge.
In Adel, Ga., a town of 5,000, child support court meets monthly. On a recent morning, a dozen men in shackles and jail uniforms faced Chuck Reddick, a state prosecutor, on their second or third round in court.
“In most cases, they simply can’t pay,” said John P. Daughtrey, who was sheriff here until losing an election in November. “An attorney could explain to the judge why jail is not the solution and how to fix it. As a sheriff, I want criminals in my jail, not a debtor’s prison.”
Mr. Reddick and Judge Carson Dane Perkins of Cook County Superior Court in Adel both said they would welcome lawyers for defendants because it would make the process clearer and smoother.
“If we could extend the right to a lawyer to civil procedures where you face a loss of liberty, that would be good,” Judge Perkins said. “Lawyers can get affidavits from employers and help make cases for those who can’t pay.”
The Southern Center for Human Rights has filed a class-action suit seeking a guarantee of a lawyer for such cases in Georgia. Sarah Geraghty, a lawyer there, said the center had received thousands of calls from Georgians facing child support hearings. Among them was Russell Davis, a Navy veteran with post-traumatic stress disorder who was jailed three times and lost his apartment and car while in jail.
Georgia also offers a case study on the mismatch between lawyers and clients at a time when each needs the other. According to the Legal Services Corporation, 70 percent of the state’s lawyers are in the Atlanta area, while 70 percent of the poor live outside it. There are six counties without a lawyer and dozens with only two or three.
Mr. Bloss, who faced eviction in New Jersey, went to legal services, which won for him the right to stay in his apartment while his case is under appeal.
In Baltimore, where Mr. Hymes was accused of shining a laser at a police officer and assigned bail of $75,000, first bail hearings do not include a lawyer. Tens of thousands are brought through Central Booking every year, facing a commissioner through a glass partition, who determines whether to release the detainee on his own recognizance or assign bail and at what level.
“For the poor, bail is a jail sentence,” said Douglas L. Colbert, a law professor at the University of Maryland. A study he conducted on 4,000 bail cases of nonviolent offenders found that two and a half times as many detainees were released on their own recognizance and bail was set at a far more affordable level if a lawyer was at the hearing.
Mr. Hymes was relatively lucky. When he eventually faced a judge with the help of a public defender, bail was slashed to $200 cash. It took his family a few weeks to pay. A student of Mr. Colbert’s, Iten Naguib, acted as an intermediary.
“If there had been an attorney involved at the initial stages,” Ms. Naguib said, “Mr. Hymes would likely have been released much earlier
Posted by at 4 comments:

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Trilogy Impeachments Judges,Public Officials 1992 to 2009


Posted by at No comments:

Monday, November 19, 2012

Illuminati 2012 End of the World Conspiracy Predictions

Posted by at 2 comments:

CitySt.Paul+OutSideCounselFees

Click here: Conspiracy Theory S03E02 Death Ray - YouTube
Sat 17Nov2012 Thanks Jessie exposing Government Death Ray's transposed to www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com USA now DividedSA All must be held Accountable. and Before its News. www.lying-lawyers.blogspot.com
Mon.19Nov.2012
To the Above Named: Specifically St.Paul City Council President Kathy Lantry AKA Mrs.Joseph Fleishaker et al Kathy Lantrys Battle Creek 25Sandarlee,EIS,EAS ... John Utley www.kennedy-graven.com et al
Please take legal Notice Affiant Sharon Scarrella Anderson 's OBJECTIONS TO ANY//ALL OUTSIDE COUNSEL FOR ANY/ALL CITY ST.PAUL,MN PROJECTS STATE AND FEDERALLY FUNDED.
In re Scarrella4Justice221NW2d562 www.sharon4judge.blogspot.com Published without Permission or Royalitys.
During this time of Fiscal Cliff, dumbing down to Municipalitys specifically City St. Paul, Sharon as Candidate Whistleblower, VA Widow must continue to Object to the City St.Paul Outrageous Appointments of Law Firms, Heinous Condemnation of Buildings, Horror's Displacing Elder Citizens from their Homesteads under the Guise of Safety, without Jury Trials,Due Process,Long Form Complaints signed by City Attorney. Specifically USSC 10-1032 Magner vs. Gallagher et al. www.freedom-4you.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org
Affiant has Standing to Object to the Outrageous Outside Counsel appointed by City St.Paul in this and other Appointments of Outside Counsel and this Contract paying $200,000.00 to the Law Firm of Kennedy and Graven, published via legistar http://stpaul.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=219389&GUID=BC159999-85AD-4AB9-B9EC-4BB96412A0BF&Options=info|&Search=
File #: RES 12-2082 Version:1 Name: Kennedy & Graven Outside Counsel Agreement
Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready
In control: City Council
Final action:
Title: Authorizing the City Attorney's Office to retain the law firm of Kennedy and Graven, Chartered, to represent the Parks and Recreation Department in the acquisition of land for the Lowertown Ballpark.
Sponsors: Kathy Lantry
Attachments: Kennedy & Graven-Outside Counsel Agreement.pdf, Kennedy and Graven Financial Anaylsis.pdf
Call Kennedy & Graven, Chartered to arrange a consultation with one of our city law attorneys, or contact them directly:
Ronald H. Batty
Shareholder		 612-337-9262
Email
Troy J. Gilchrist
Shareholder		 612-337-9214
Email
Corrine A. Heine
Shareholder		 612-337-9217
Email
Charles L. LeFevere
Shareholder		 612-337-9215
Email
Melissa J. Manderschied
Associate		 612-337-9274
Email
Michael T. Norton
Shareholder & Former President		 612-337-9242
Email
Scott J. Riggs
Shareholder		 612-337-9260
Email
Sarah J. Sonsalla
Shareholder		 612-337-9284
Email
James J. Thomson
Shareholder & Former President		 612-337-9209
Email
Mary D. Tietjen
Shareholder		 612-337-9277
Email
Robert J.V. Vose
Shareholder		 612-337-9275
Email

Attorney Profiles and Contact Information

Kennedy & Graven, Chartered — Minneapolis, Saint Paul, and St. Cloud, Minnesota

Robert A. Alsop
Shareholder		 Employment and Labor Law
Housing Law
Litigation		 612-337-9224
Email
Ronald H. Batty
Shareholder		 Economic Development & Redevelopment
Municipal Law		 612-337-9262
Email
Jenny Boulton
Shareholder		 Public Finance 612-337-9202
Email
Stephen J. Bubul
Shareholder		 Economic Development & Redevelopment
Municipal Bonds
Public Finance		 612-337-9228
Email
Robert C. Carlson
Of Counsel		 Business Law 612-337-9223
Email
Robert L. Davidson
Of Counsel		 Real Estate Law 612-337-9203
Email
Mary M. Dyrseth
Shareholder		 Public Finance 612-337-9221
Email
Julie Eddington
Shareholder		 Municipal Bonds
Public Finance 		612-337-9213
Email
Troy J. Gilchrist
Shareholder		 Municipal Law
Township Law 		612-337-9214
Email
Corrine A. Heine
Shareholder		 Eminent Domain
Municipal Law
Real Estate Law		 612-337-9217
Email
Martha N. Ingram
Shareholder		 Economic Development & Redevelopment
Municipal Bonds
Public Finance		 612-337-9300
Email
Benjamin W. Johnson
Shareholder		 Municipal Bonds
Public Finance		 612-337-9259
Email
David J. Kennedy
Deceased
Charles L. LeFevere
Shareholder		 Municipal Law 612-337-9215
Email
Robert J. Lindall
Shareholder		 Eminent Domain
Environmental Law
Real Estate Law		 612-337-9219
Email
Charles E. Long
Shareholder		 School Law 612-337-9306
Email
Gregory S. Madsen
Shareholder		 Employment and Labor Law
School Law		 612-337-9305
Email
Melissa J. Manderschied
Shareholder		 Municipal Law 612-337-9274
Email
Peter G. Mikhail
Shareholder		 Litigation 612-337-9220
Email
Michael T. Norton
Shareholder & Former President		 Economic Development & Redevelopment
Municipal Law
Real Estate Law		 612-337-9242
Email
Gloria Blaine Olsen
Of Counsel		 Employment and Labor Law
School Law		 612-337-9303
Email
Timothy R. Palmatier
Shareholder		 School Law 612-337-9304
Email
Scott J. Riggs
Shareholder		 Economic Development & Redevelopment
Municipal Law
Real Estate Law
Township Law		 612-337-9260
Email
Rhonda Skoby
Associate		 Economic Development & Redevelopment
Financing Transactions
Public Finance		 612-337-9283
Email
Sarah J. Sonsalla
Shareholder		 Economic Development & Redevelopment
Municipal Law
Real Estate Law		 612-337-9284
Email
James M. Strommen
Shareholder & Former President		 Litigation
Public Utility Law 		612-337-9233
Email
James J. Thomson
Shareholder & Former President		 Litigation
Municipal Law		 612-337-9209
Email
Mary D. Tietjen
Shareholder		 Employment and Labor Law
Municipal Law
Litigation		 612-337-9277
Email
Susan E. Torgerson
Shareholder		 Litigation
School Law		 612-337-9302
Email
John Utley
Shareholder & Current President		 Municipal Bonds
Public Finance		 612-337-9270
Email
Robert J. V. Vose
Shareholder		 Municipal Law
Public Utility Law		 612-337-9275
Email
Maggie R. Wallner
Shareholder		 Employment and Labor Law
Litigation
School Law		 612-337-9301
Email
Larry M. Wertheim
Shareholder		 Real Estate Law 612-337-9216
Email
Bonnie L. Wilkins
Of Counsel		 Real Estate Law 612-337-9225
Email

Sharon4Anderson@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE Candidate
MN Attorney General www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com 2014 2012Senate64 www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com
http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption-_sharonscarrellaanderson_lawless-america/http://www.pacificlegal.org/document.doc?id=608&utm_source=Sentry+-+3%2F21%2F12+Healthcare&utm_campaign=3-21-12+Healthcare+SENTRY&utm_medium=emailhttp://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdfhttp://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/2007/03/foia-06cv-permission-to.htmlhttp://mpls.startribune.com/news/metro/elections/profiles/26222.htmlhttp://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdfhttp://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file6.pdfwww.sharon4anderson.org http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/900-2007-02-27T034409Z/WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdfhttp://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/google-lawmen-cases-mn-62cv09-1163/
POA http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcorr/SADPA4172006.pdfhttp://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profile/SharonScarrellaAndersonwww.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)